Let’s say you’re a reporter with
advance knowledge that police will raid an abandoned old department store
building to evict homeless squatters protesting the fact that the location
hasn’t been converted to free housing as promised by the government. Let’s also
say that you are in telephone contact with those inside the target building.
Do you tell those inside the
building about police plans?
Police in Vancouver, B.C. claim reporters did exactly that. Now,
they are investigating and threatening to charge media members with obstruction
of justice and violating a court order to vacate the building, according to an
article on Canada.com.
According the story, police say
reporters actually went further than tipping off protestors in the building.
“Riot squad officers were blinded by bright camera lights as they entered the
dilapidated Woodward’s building Saturday to evict homeless squatters who had
been there for over a week," the story said.
“Certain phone calls were made
to certain media inside that building and in fact people that were in that
building were being briefed as to the police activity outside,” said the
Vancouver police chief.
According to police, protestors
had erected barricades and other fortifications in stairwells.
“We have a situation where
police are coming into a possibly volatile situation,” said a spokeswoman for
the force. “Members of the media giving advance notice to the individuals
inside certainly affects police officer safety.”
Ultimately, more than 60 people
were arrested both inside and on the street outside the abandoned store, the
article said.
She also said that members of
the news media “were warned not to be present at the protest.”
At Interviewing, we’d love to hear opinions on this one, especially if
you are a news reporter or other member of the news media.
If reporters did give building
occupants advance notice of the police raid, is there any justification for
that action? Should reporters have heeded police warnings to stay away from the
protest? And what about the TV lights allegedly blinding police officers as
they entered the building? An acceptable action in pursuit of the public’s
right to know?