What the tempting simplicity of the above title refers to is
the possible tax advantages that could be engendered for builders and
developers through the use of an “ABC,” otherwise known as an Assignment for
the Benefit of Creditors. An ABC
is one of those arcane vehicles employed by professionals in the world of
restructuring, and it’s just another means of arranging for the disposition of a
troubled entity’s assets.
For many real estate developers and home builders, an ABC, because
of the potential tax advantages to be garnered, might well be the most recommended
course of action during these difficult economic times. Since builders and developers may well
benefit from the distinct tax advantage available through the ABC process, as
compared to other alternatives such as bankruptcy or, worse, foreclosure, more
than a little thought ought to go into weighing these differing solutions when
hard times are encountered.
Basically, through the employment of the vehicle of an ABC, builders and
developers may be able to make use of their current corporate tax loss
carrybacks now, instead of waiting for another disposition of their property,
such as through sale or foreclosure.
Moreover, the so-called stimulus bill recently signed into law would
expand the ability of entities to use loss carrybacks from the current two-year
limitation to a full five years. For
qualifying builders and developers this means that current losses could be used
to offset income that was earned in the recent heady days of a stronger
economy, when real property sales and related values were at or near their
peak.
What is an ABC?
An Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors, or ABC, is one
of several possibilities that can be employed in arranging for the disposition
of a troubled company’s assets.
The company (or Assignor) executes an agreement to transfer all of its
property to a neutral third party (the “Assignee”) who is, by definition,
independent and disinterested, and willing to undertake the role of acting as a
fiduciary for all of the business’s creditors. The Assignment itself is accomplished by way of a written
contract and has the effect of deeding and conveying all of the assets of the
company to the neutral third-party fiduciary who serves as Assignee. The Assignee’s obligation thereafter is
to timely liquidate all of the assets so received for the benefit of the
company’s creditors, and to pay over the proceeds derived from this liquidation
to the various classes of creditors in accordance with the priorities dictated
by law in these matters. Once an
ABC is undertaken, the creditors of the business may then look only to the
Assignee, and the assets that were conveyed to him or her, for satisfaction of
any obligations they may have arising from their business relationships with
the company.
Because Assignments are governed by state law, there is a
good deal of variance from state to state regarding the specifics of the
Assignment. In some states, for
example, an ABC is a court-supervised procedure, while in others the Assignee
administers the Assignment estate within the bounds of the state’s laws but without
judicial oversight.
Unlike what occurs in a bankruptcy, there is no discharge of
the company’s debts in an ABC, but as Geoff Berman (a colleague at DSI) points
out in his handbook on ABCs, that is the practical effect. He writes, “A general assignment
‘stops’ creditors from pursuing the debtor (i.e., the company) through
collection lawsuits” and “when the various individual aspects of state laws are
brought into effect upon the making and acceptance of the general assignment,
the practical effect is that creditor actions become ineffective.”[1]
What are the pros and
cons of an ABC?
The good news is that ABCs are customarily much faster, far
more efficient and certainly less expensive than a bankruptcy proceeding. Moreover, they often avoid the difficult
impact on related businesses that foreclosures may often have. Most companies wisely choose to assign
the assets to an experienced professional for whom managing the Assignment is a
normal part of his or her business (including, yes, the authors of this very
article). It’s widely recognized
that the careful selection of professionals involved in an ABC will not only
lead to a more efficient and less costly administration of the Assignment, but
will also measurably help ensure that the Assignee is disinterested and
neutral, thus fostering confidence among the creditor body that the matter is
being handled with the appropriate commercial integrity. Absent disinterestedness, creditors could
suspect either potential wrongdoing or illicit motives, with the result that
they could force the company into involuntary bankruptcy as well as, possibly,
bringing suit against the company and its management.
On the other hand, its absolutely true that an Assignment
will never be the appropriate vehicle if what the company’s owners and
management are looking to do is to restructure the business and continue its
operations into the future.
Remember, an Assignment fully divests the company, on an irrevocable
basis, of all of its ownership interests in its assets, including the proceeds
derived from their liquidation.
Therefore, if reorganization of the enterprise is truly the goal, then a
Chapter 11 Reorganization or, if the parties are amenable, a
private workout or composition arrangement would be a far better choice as to a
course of action under those circumstances.
What about that
“distinct tax advantage” mentioned above?
As mentioned earlier in this article, it’s our belief that
developers and builders may be able to preserve, via the vehicle of an ABC,
their ability to carry back losses on real property they part with in
conjunction with the conveyance of assets in an Assignment. Some recent articles on the subject have
suggested that an ABC can be used for the purpose of accelerating losses such
that recognition of those losses comes within an adequate timeframe sufficient
to carry it back to the prior tax year, or even earlier tax years, if permitted.[2]
For the purposes of this essay, remember that tax losses may
be recognized when real property is deemed “abandoned” as that term is defined
for tax purposes, and that an ABC can certainly be the appropriate vehicle and
means to effectuate such an abandonment.
For example, an abandonment requires that the property’s owner express
an intent to abandon the property as well as perform some affirmative act that
evidences the intent to abandon and relinquish all rights in the property,
including any residual benefits.
In an Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors, the intent
and relinquishment requirements can be managed through the language of the
Assignment itself, as an ABC you’ll recall is based on a written contract. The affirmative act comes upon the
execution of the Assignment when the Assignee takes possession and control of
all of the assets including any real estate. Therefore, loss on the property may be recognized when the
Assignment takes place and without regard to when the Assignee ultimately
actually sells or otherwise disposes of the property.
With respect to any effort that allows a property owner to quickly
access the benefit of any loss carryback provisions, not only does an ABC
minimize the delays in the resolution of a property’s disposition, as can be encountered
in other alternative proceedings like bankruptcy or foreclosure, but it may even
be better, from a timing standpoint, than what can happen when one tries to wait
out the hoped-for straight sale of a property. It is the rapid disposition of the property, for tax
purposes, that can be achieved through the execution of an Assignment that can
make all the difference for developers and builders who are trying to realize
value from otherwise troubled assets.
Conclusion
As is always the case, and especially where complicated tax
issues are the subject of discussion, this article really just scratches the
surface of Assignments for the Benefit of Creditors and why the use of an ABC
might be the right choice for either a real estate developer or a homebuilder
burdened with property which they are unable to unload given the current economic
conditions. Naturally, anyone
considering this course of action should consult with his or her professionals to
learn more about the ins and outs of the ABC process, as well as to ensure that
the language of any Assignment contract will incorporate the purpose and intent
of the ABC along the lines discussed within this article.
[1] Geoffrey L.
Berman, General Assignments for the
Benefit of Creditors: A Practical
Guide 2d ed., American Bankruptcy Institute 2006.
[2] See, e.g.,
Thomas O. Wells and Joseph R. Schortz, Accelerating
Losses with an Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors, The Florida Bar
Journal, November 2008.
ABOUT THE
AUTHORS
James A. Chatz
Attorney Jimmy Chatz is a partner in the Chicago office
of Arnstein & Lehr LLP. He has
substantial experience in the field of commercial insolvency and creditors'
rights law, representing clients throughout the United States. He also
practices in the areas of corporate law and business law, mergers and
acquisitions, financial planning, and commercial litigation. Mr. Chatz spends a
significant portion of his time in South Florida with the law firm's Boca
Raton, Fort Lauderdale, Miami, Tampa, and West Palm Beach offices, providing
his knowledge and experience as a resource to businesses and individuals with
significant interests in South Florida.
William A.
Brandt, Jr.
Bill Brandt has been in the business of workout,
turnaround and insolvency consulting for more than thirty years and is widely
recognized as one of the foremost practitioners in the field. He is President
and CEO of Development Specialists, Inc. (DSI), a firm specializing in the
provision of management, consulting and turnaround assistance to troubled or
reorganizing enterprises. The firm maintains offices in Chicago, New York, Los
Angeles, London, Miami, San Francisco, Cleveland, Columbus and Boston.
Catherine E. Vance
Catherine E. Vance is vice president of Research &
Policy and associate general counsel at Development Specialists, Inc., resident
in the firm’s Columbus, Ohio, office.
Ms. Vance has written extensively on matters
related to bankruptcy, bankruptcy reform, privacy, and other matters affecting
the debtor/creditor relationship and insolvency proceedings. When the
bankruptcy reform legislation was enacted in early 2005, Ms. Vance quickly
emerged as a leading authority on the new law, particularly its attorney
liability provisions. Ms. Vance
served as contributing editor and author of the book, "Attorney Liability
in Bankruptcy," published by the American Bar Association in 2006, and she
has written several articles on various aspects of the new law.