Planning for Challenges of Global Clinical Trials
Leah R. Kendall, Epstein
Becker & Green P.C.
Pharmaceutical and medical device
companies are increasingly recognizing that international clinical studies offer
important advantages to studies undertaken in the United States, but they are
also recognizing that international studies present numerous complex legal
challenges. In terms of advantages, studies
conducted abroad can be a source of drug-naïve patients, which can be rare in
the United States, and they can help to provide a large number of patients as
well. Global studies can also help
foster sponsors’ relationships with different clinical sites and investigators and
with global thought leaders. Moreover,
conducting research abroad allows companies that sponsor research to lay the
groundwork for regulatory approvals in markets outside of the United States.
To ensure that they reap the
potential benefits of international studies, however, sponsors should be
prepared to address challenges that may arise while structuring and managing international
clinical studies. This article
highlights key challenges and preparatory steps that a sponsor should consider
from a health care regulatory perspective when venturing into the realm of
global clinical trials.
Potential Challenges
Sponsors should be prepared to
face several health care regulatory challenges with respect to clinical studies
conducted partially or entirely outside the United States:
-
Legal Agreements. One potential challenge is the development
of an efficient contracting process that protects the sponsor and that is consistent
throughout the globe. For example, if a
sponsor has 50 or 100 study sites in multiple countries, how does the sponsor
minimize risk exposure? Further, if the
sponsor is a global company, how can it work with its local affiliates to leverage
internal resources, while also ensuring that legal agreements are sufficiently
protective?
Regarding the content for site and
investigator contracts, each country may have its own legal requirements that impact
the clinical study agreement. For
example, certain countries have legal requirements for insurance or for
indemnification, while other countries have requirements on the number of
agreements that a sponsor might need.
Additionally, if the sponsor plans to use study data to support a
marketing submission in the U.S., it needs to know what legal controls are
required in order to ensure that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
will accept the study data.
Additionally, sponsors often use contract
research organizations (CROs) to help conduct, monitor, and manage
research. CRO expertise and manpower
potentially can be invaluable – especially in global studies. That said, companies sometimes struggle with
how contractually to ensure a CRO’s performance.
-
Working with CROs. Sponsors may also struggle with using and
managing CROs effectively. An
international clinical trial can exacerbate this struggle, because sponsors may
use multiple CROs or multiple affiliates of a CRO. In this regard, sponsors may find it challenging to monitor and
measure the various aspects of a CRO’s performance, particularly on a global
scale.
-
Effective Monitoring
and Site Access. Sponsors may
be concerned about whether they will have access to well-qualified monitors
abroad – through either a CRO or the sponsor’s internal resources. Moreover, even if a sponsor has excellent
monitors, the sponsor can still encounter basic practical challenges in terms
of transportation, adequate site facilities, language barriers and translation
issues that can impede monitoring the study, thereby leading to serious
compliance problems.
-
Payment Issues. Budgetary issues – including third-party
reimbursement – can encompass payments and costs surrounding research-related
activities, routine care, and injuries to study subjects that may arise during
or after the study. Needless to say,
these can be extraordinarily complex issues.
Careful and diligent planning is critical
to meeting challenges like these – and for being prepared to surmount the
unexpected but inevitable problems that will arise during the course of a study. Below are some suggestions for sponsors to
consider as they plan for studies conducted abroad.
Overcoming the Challenges
While each sponsor’s situation is
unique, there are some universal considerations that are useful for sponsors to
consider as they plan for international studies. Sponsors should think carefully about the oversight and
management of their trials. Internally,
who is going to champion the process?
Who is going to be responsible for keeping track of all the moving
pieces and ensuring that it all comes together? While somewhat obvious, it bears mentioning that excellent project
management skills are needed to keep sight of the big picture and all the
moving pieces. Substantive knowledge is
important, but equally important is having a detail-oriented and responsive
person or team to manage the clinical trials process.
Sponsors should also consider who
will handle the contracting process internally – and how they will do it. For example, will internal legal counsel
manage it at a high level, or will they draft and negotiate contracts on their
own? If outside counsel is involved,
what responsibilities will they assume?
In this regard, there are a wide range of possibilities – from
negotiating directly with sites, to drafting contract templates, to providing
discrete areas of expertise.
The actual substance of the
agreements is another matter. While the
intricacies of legal provisions are beyond the scope of this article, thinking
about acceptable provisions within clinical trial agreements before the
agreements are negotiated or even drafted will often save the sponsor time and
money in the long run. Among the
provisions to consider are indemnification, payment for study subject injuries,
insurance, publication, intellectual property, monitoring, confidentiality,
governing law and venue. Further, assuming
that the sponsor’s goal is FDA approval, it should think about FDA data acceptance
issues and the legal requirements with which a site must comply.
Just as with clinical trial
agreements, a sponsor should also consider the provisions it will require in
its contracts with CROs. In this
regard, a sponsor is often concerned about how to ensure a CRO performs
according to the sponsor’s expectations.
One way to accomplish this is to contractually require the CRO to meet
certain performance metrics. Sometimes these metrics are tied to financial
penalties if the CRO fails to meet them.
Drafting a clear, comprehensive, and well thought-out statement of work
is also critical to obtaining a high level of performance. For example, a statement of work should balance
the authority and responsibility given to a CRO with close and careful
supervision by the sponsor. A sponsor
must always remember that it, not the CRO, is ultimately responsible for the data
and marketing submission.
Sponsors should also conduct due
diligence when engaging external resources to help them with tasks such as the
contracting process or monitoring. For
example, a potential contractor should be able to back up its marketing
statements with references and examples of representative expertise. Sponsors also should not underestimate the
power of networking – consider asking contacts at other companies for
recommendations on resources.
In addition to due diligence on
external contractors, performing due diligence on both potential sites and investigators
can also be important for a sponsor’s success in international clinical
studies. In terms of legal
requirements, a critical consideration is whether the clinical sites and
investigators are compliant with Good Clinical Practices (GCPs), including the
International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) standards and guidelines. Assuming that the relevant sites and
investigators are in compliance with GCPs, a sponsor should further consider a
country’s local requirements and legal infrastructure. For example, one basic question is whether
the country has a reputable and solid infrastructure where a dispute can be
resolved in an expeditious and fair manner. Other legal considerations include insurance requirements,
intellectual property rights and patent protection, and jurisdictional issues
related to the country’s courts and legal system.
Another important question is
whether the standard of medical care in the country is compatible with the
study design. Companies should also
consider any potential cultural or ethical barriers. For example, in developing countries, the trial participants and even
the study sites may believe that the sponsor is providing medical care and may
not fully appreciate the experimental nature of the trial. However, every sponsor’s situation is unique
and disadvantages may be outweighed by advantage; for example, sponsors will
also want to take into account where they or their CROs already have strong
relationships with clinical sites and investigators. Prior success is often one of the best predictors of future
success.
A final suggestion is that
sponsors should consider “Plan B” for the unavoidable setbacks as the study
gets underway. What happens, for
example, if one or more sites just simply do not move forward with their legal
agreements and other required regulatory documents -- what is the plan if
certain sites just don’t come to fruition?
Or what if there are major compliance – even data integrity --
issues?
In summary, undertaking a
clinical study with international sites can be a daunting task. However, by being proactive, diligent and
thoughtful during the initial planning process, sponsors can help to ensure
their study is a success.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leah R. Kendall is an
Associate in the Health Care and Life Sciences practice group at Epstein Becker
& Green, P.C. Leah regularly helps
clients navigate the legal, practical, and ethical challenges pertaining to
clinical research. You may reach Leah
at lkendall@ebglaw.com or
202-861-4197.