INTERNATIONAL LEGAL NEWS

Friday, February 8, 2008 VOLUME 5 ISSUE 1  
HOME
REGIONS
ASIA PACIFIC
EUROPE
NORTH AMERICA
SOUTH AMERICA
NORTH AMERICA
The Federal Trade Commission’s Amended Franchise Rule: An International Perspective
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Non-Money Judgments in Canada
Purchase of Bahamian Real Estate by Non-Bahamians
2007 Circular 230 Revisions
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Takes Another Step in Facilitating Capital Formation for Foreign Private Issuers
Benefits and Risks of Fractional Aircraft Ownership
Avoiding Liability Exposure From Defective Products Made Abroad
Challenges in International Arbitration for Non-Signatories
CSR and Sustainability: Local Impacts of Global Supply Chains
Medical Tourism: The U.S. Industry and Legal Fundamentals
ASIA PACIFIC
Arbitration-by-Attrition: Is Arbitration in Australia Losing its Appeal?
Singhania & Partners Newsletter from India
Be alert but not alarmed:The new Australian Labor Government’s proposed Industrial Relations legislation
EUROPE
Is it OK to use the word Russia for your Russian subsidiary?
Arbitration and Competition Law : A Troublesome Relationship
Restrictive Covenants – A swing back in favour of the employer?
The European Company and the Directive 2005/56/EC on cross-border mergers: a view from France
Czech green card project for non-EU skilled workers
Use of E-Mail and Internet in the Employment Context
Comparative Advertising Regulation in Russia
Personal Data Protection Sanctions Imposed by the French Data Protection Authority and Risk Prevention
Corporate Compliance Required Under Italian Legal System
VAT Treatment of the Leasing Contract of Leisure Yacht - Italian Tax Authority Resolution no. 284/E dated October 11, 2007
SOUTH AMERICA
Brazil's Tax System
Corporate Compliance Required Under Italian Legal System
Corrado Ferrari Mainieri Pedeferri & soc, Rome
by Caterina Mainieri and Paolo Passino

The Legislative Decree no. 231, dated June 8, 2001 (Lgs. D. 231/2001), has introduced in the Italian legal system a new type of liability for legal entities, companies and associations, including bodies without legal personality (hereinafter referred to as: Company). This new regime of liability allows to directly sanction – through the payment of an administrative fine of considerable amount and through the limitation to the capacity of the Company to carry out certain types of commercial activities - the Company, that, with or without awareness, took advantage from, has an interest in, has received a benefit from a criminal offence committed by individuals who represent the Company or act in any way in the interest of the latter. As a matter of fact, the legislator conceived the Company’s liability as a consequence of negligent conduct and, therefore, such liability seems to arise from the non existence or non observance of the required security measures and control standards within the Company’s organization. Thus, broadly speaking, by creating this new type of liability and by granting at the same time an exemption from liability in specific cases the main purpose of Lgs. D. 231/2001 is to induce companies to adopt codes of ethics and internal rules in order to prevent managers, executives, employees and external collaborators from committing economic crimes against the Public Administration, as well as other corporate criminal offences.

Click Here for the PDF of the complete article
[PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION]
LETTERS

There are no letters for this article. To post your own letter, click Post Letter.

[POST LETTER]
Published by Alan Griffiths
Copyright © 2008 International Lawyers Network. All rights reserved.
TELL A FRIEND
Powered by IMN