Doing Business in China:
Protecting Your Intellectual Property
Rights
By Jian
Hang
© 2005 Epstein Becker &
Green, P.C.
I. Understanding
China’s Intellectual Property Laws
A. Patent
Law
a. Patentable
Subject Matter
Under U.S. patent law, there are three types of patents:
utility patents, design patents, and plant patents. Under China’s current patent law,
there are also three types of patents: invention patents, utility model patents,
and design patents. China’s
invention patents and utility model patents correspond to the U.S. utility
patent. Although both countries’
design patents are nearly the same, what U.S. patent laws calls “plant patents”
are not similarly protected under China’s patent law.
Furthermore, as in most countries, there are statutory limits
to the patentability of subject matter in China. No patent right shall be granted in China for any of the
following subject matters: (1) scientific discoveries; (2) rules and methods
for mental activities; (3) methods for the diagnosis or for the treatment of
diseases; (4) animals and plant varieties; and (5) substances obtained by means
of nuclear transformation. Patent right, however, may be granted
for processes used in producing animals and plant varieties products. Computer software is not patentable,
but may be protected under China’s Copyright Law (see more below).
b. First
to File v. First to Invent
The
United States has a “first to invent” patent system. Furthermore, after the first public disclosure or
description of an invention, or the initial offer for sale or sale of that
invention, the inventor still has one more year to file a patent
application.
China
adopts a “first to file,” rather than a “first to invent” rule. If two or more applicants file applications
for a patent for the identical invention, the first filed patent shall be
granted.
Further, China’s patent law indicates that any invention,
utility model, or design for which a patent right may be granted must possess
novelty. Novelty means that, prior to the date
of filing, no identical invention, utility model, or design has been publicly
disclosed in China or abroad, nor has it been publicly used or made known to
the public by any other means in China, nor has any other person filed
previously an application that describes the identical invention or utility
model and was published after said filing date. There is an exception to the novelty
rule, which allows a limited conditional grace period of six-months if an
invention was first exhibited at an international exhibition sponsored or
recognized by the Chinese Government or first made public at a prescribed academic
or technological meetings, or was disclosed by another person without the
applicant’s consent.
c. Compulsory
Licensing
U.S.
patent law, with certain narrow exceptions, grants a patentee an absolute right
to refuse to license or otherwise to permit others to practice the patented
invention. Conversely, China’s patent
law allows for compulsory licensing for exploitation of a patent. If a qualified entity has requested for
authorization from the patentee of an invention or utility model to exploit the
patentee’s patent and has not been successful within a reasonable period of
time, a compulsory license may be granted to such entity to exploit the patent
for the invention or utility model. A compulsory license may also be
granted in case of a national emergency or any extraordinary state of affairs.
An
applicant for a compulsory license has the burden to prove that it has not been
able to conclude a license with the patentee for exploitation of the subject
patent on reasonable terms and conditions. An applicant that is granted a
compulsory license for exploitation does not have an exclusive right to exploit
the patent nor does such applicant have the right to authorize exploitation by
any others. As a practical matter, U.S. patentees
in China cannot avoid compulsory licenses. With proper legal assistance from a legal counsel, however,
an U.S. patentee may seek to terminate a compulsory license if the
circumstances justifying the compulsory license cease to exist and are unlikely
to recur.
B. Trademark
law
a. Registrable
Marks
China’s current Trademark Law
protects registrable marks, referred to as any visually perceptible signs
capable of distinguishing goods or services. Registrable marks include words,
devices, letters, numerals, three-dimensional signs, combination of colors, and
the combination of such signs. Registrable marks shall have distinctive
character and shall not conflict with the legal rights acquired earlier by
other persons.
Some signs are not registrable marks and their registration is
prohibited by China’s Trademark law.
These signs include: (1) signs that consist exclusively of the generic
names, designs, or model numbers of the goods with respect to which the
trademark is used; (2) signs that consist exclusively of direct indications of
the quality, primary raw material, functions, intended purposes, weight,
quantity or other characteristics of goods; and (3) signs that are devoid of
any distinctive character.
b. First
to Register v. First to Use
China’s Trademark Law adopts a “first to file” rule for
trademark registrations, rather than a “first to use” rule generally employed
in the United States. If two or
more applicants apply for registration of identical or similar trademarks with respect
to identical or similar goods, the application filed the earliest shall be
approved. If the applications are filed on the same
day, the first used trademark shall be approved, and applications of other
persons shall be refused and not be published.
China recognizes two important international trademark
treaties that are closely connected with China’s trademark registration
system. The first treaty is the Paris
Convention to which both the United States
and China are members. According
to this treaty, a United States company that has applied for registration of a
trademark outside China can claim the earlier outside filing date for the same mark
in China, as long as an application in China is filed within six months from
the date of filing outside China.
The United States and China are also member countries of the Madrid
Protocol, a centralized international
trademark filing system. Under the
Madrid Protocol, a U.S. company may apply for registration of a trademark in
the United States and extend its protection to China by notifying the Madrid
Union Office of the particular trademark application. A U.S. company, however, should also realize that a Chinese
company may use the same procedure to apply for trademark protection in the U.S.
c. Registration
of Chinese Version of Foreign Language Trademark
Homonyms
are very common in the Chinese language; therefore, a foreign language
trademark could be translated into many different Chinese versions. For example, Starbucks can be translated
as Xingbake because Xing means “star” in Chinese and “bake” phonetically sounds
like “bucks.”
A U.S. company had better register a Chinese version of its
non-Chinese language trademark if such Chinese version of the trademark is to
be used in its business. Even if
such Chinese version of the trademark is not used in China, a US company is
still strongly encouraged to register it in the Chinese language if it is well acknowledged
and accepted by Chinese customers.
Furthermore, a U.S. company should ensure that its Chinese version of a
trademark will communicate the intended meaning of its non-Chinese language
trademark across the many dialects and regions of Greater China.
d. Well-known
Trademarks
A well-known trademark means a trademark that is widely known
to the relevant sectors of the public and enjoys a relatively high reputation
in China. Coca-Cola, McDonalds, Disney, and Wal-Mart
are typical examples of well-known trademarks in China that are entitled to a
higher level of protection. An
entity can acquire a certificate of well-known trademark from the trademark office
in China. The certificate is good
for three years and can be renewed after the end of the three years. In proving a certificate of well-known
trademark, the trademark office shall consider the following factors: (1) the
degree of knowledge or recognition of the trademark in the relevant sector of the
public; (2) the duration of the use of the trademark; (3) the duration, extent
and geographical area of any promotion of the trademark; (4) the record of
successful enforcement of rights in the trademark; and (5) other evidence
certifying that the trademark is well known.
As
mentioned above, a well-known trademark enjoys certain special protections and
privileges. For example, China’s
trademark law prohibits registration of a trademark if such trademark is
identical with or similar to an interested party’s well-known trademark that is
not registered in China on identical or similar goods and is likely to create
confusion. China’s trademark law
also prohibits registration of a trademark if such trademark is identical with
or similar to an interested party’s well-known trademark that is not registered
in China on identical or similar goods and is likely to mislead the public and
damage the interests of owner of the well-known registered trademark.
Furthermore,
China’s trademark law seems to employ a first to use rule, rather than a fist
to register rule for registration of well-known trademarks. When an application to register a
trademark has been refused due to the similarities to a previously registered
trademark, evidence of prior use will be helpful for the purpose of challenging
the registration if such trademark provided to be “well-known” under the law.
C. Copyright
law
a. Copyrighted
Works
U.S. copyright law protects all published and unpublished
works of all nationals no matter where they are domiciled, within or outside
the United States. In contrast, China’s
current copyright law
does not protect unpublished works of foreign authors. Works of Chinese citizens, whether
published or not, enjoy the full protection of the Chinese Copyright Law.
Works of a foreigner, however, are
protected by China’s copyright law only if such works are first published in
the territory of China, or if such works are first published outside China, the
foreign authors are nationals of a country belonging to a copyright agreement
or treaty of which China is a member, or such works are published in an country
that is a party to a treaty with China.
Categories of works protected by China’s copyright law are
similar to their counterparts under U.S. copyright law. China’s copyright law, however, is not
applicable to the following: (1) government-issued laws, regulations,
resolutions, decisions and orders; (2) news on current affairs; and (3)
calendars, numerical tables and forms of general use, and formulas.
For copyright protection, foreign copyright owners do not
have to apply for registration of their works with China’s National Copyright
Administrative (“NCA”) office.
However, it is suggested that foreign copyright owners register their
works voluntarily with NCA to establish evidence of ownership against copyright
infringement.
b. Computer
Software
Computer software is protected by both China’s copyright law and the Regulations
on Computer Software Protection. Computer software is defined as
computer programs and relevant documents. Consistent with the copyright law, the
Computer Software Protection Regulations state that only Chinese citizens enjoy
the full benefits of copyright in the computer software they have developed,
whether published or not. Foreigners enjoy benefits of copyright
in the computer software, however, only if they their software is first
published in China or they are nationals of a country that was a party to a
copyright agreement or a treaty with China.
China’s computer software protection does not extend to the
ideas, processing, operating methods, mathematical concepts or the like used in
software development. Computer software copyright comes to
existence as soon as its development has been completed. Registration of computer software is
not required by law in order to obtain copyright protection, but is recommended
for the reasons stated above.
II. Enforcement and
Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in China
A. Double-track
System: Administrative Track and Judicial Track
China has a double-track enforcement system,
also called a two-track system, to protect intellectual property rights. According to this double-track
system, a party may bring an action against an infringer in a court or,
alternatively, file a complaint to solve the dispute in the competent
administrative office.
Administrative resolution is not mandatory prior to a judicial
resolution.
A list of major administrative
authorities for intellectual property rights enforcement are as follows: (1) State
Intellectual Property Office (“SIPO”), responsible for patent affairs
administration and handling patent disputes; (2) State Administration on
Industry and Commerce (“SAIC”), in charge of enforcement of trademarks and
cracking down on trademark infringement; (3) National Copyright Administration
Office (“NCA”), in charge of local copyright affairs administration including
copyright enforcement. (4) Quality & Technology Supervision Bureau
(“QTSB”), responsible for handling infringement of registered trademarks; (5)
General Administration of Customs (“GAC”), in charge of banning the
import/export of goods that infringe on intellectual property rights. In addition, those major administrative
authorities may transfer serious intellectual property infringement cases to
the Public Security Bureau (“PSB”) and People’s Procuratorates
(“Procuratorates”) to initiate criminal investigation.
The
Chinese judicial system consists of four levels of People’s courts: (1) the
Supreme People’s Court at the national level; (2) the higher people’s court at the
provincial level; (3) the intermediate people’s court at the municipal level;
and (4) the basic people’s courts at the county level. Generally, the intermediate people’s
courts hear the first trial of intellectual property case.
B. Administrative
and Judicial Remedies
a Damages
Damages for intellectual property rights
infringement may be calculated based on the losses suffered by the owner of the
intellectual right or unlawful profits gained by the infringer through the
infringement. When it is difficult
to determine either the losses suffered by the owner or unlawful profits gained
by the infringer, the damages should usually be assed within the range of Chinese
Yuan 5,000 to 500,000 (about US$600 to US$60,000).
b.
Preliminary
Injunctions
Where the owner of an intellectual
property right or an interested party has evidence showing that another person
is infringing or will soon infringe on the owner or interested party’s intellectual
property right and that if such an infringing act is not stopped in a timely
manner, irreparable injury will be caused to the owner’s legitimate rights and
interests, the owner or interested party may, before instituting legal
proceedings, apply to the people’s court for relief prohibiting the act and
preserving the intellectual property.
c. Criminal
Remedies
If an intellectual property infringement
constitutes a criminal offense, the infringing party could be punished with
imprisonment or criminal detention of no more than three years, with a fine, or
simply be assessed a fine. If the infringement is of a more serious nature, the
infringing party could be punished with imprisonment of at least three years but
no more than seven years, and with fine
III. Trade Secrets and Non-competition
Clauses
A. Trade
Secrets/Business Secrets
Trade
secrets, also known as “business secrets,” are protected by China’s Anti-unfair
Competition Law, and some
rules and provisions of contract law, civil law, and criminal law. Business secrets are defined as
nonpublic technical information and operational information, which can bring
economic benefits to the owner of the rights, and for which the owner has
adopted measures to keep the information secret. Business secrets infringement includes:
(1) obtaining the owner’s business secrets by stealing, promising gain,
resorting to coercion or other improper means; (2) disclosing, using, or
allowing others to use the owner’s business secrets obtained by the means
mentioned in (1); and (3) disclosing, using or allowing others to use business
secrets obtained by breaching an engagement or disregarding confidentiality
requirements of the owner. It is a business secret infringement
for a third party to obtain, use or disclose the others’ business secret if
such third party knew or should have known the acts were illegal as mentioned
above.
Under
the Anti-unfair Competition Law, when any party infringes the business secrets
of another, the violator may be ordered to stop the illegal act and may have a
fine of at least Chinese Yuan 10,000 Yuan (about US $1,250) and no more than
Chinese Yuan 200,000 Yuan (about US $25,000) imposed. There are also other sanctions under
the law including civil remedies such as damages, and criminal penalties for
serious violations.
To
protect its business secrets in China, a U.S. company should implement
affirmative measures to keep the trade secrets by ensuring that the business
secret is not published, but kept secret.
Such affirmative measures include: (1) maintaining and marking documents as “confidential” and
“trade secret”; (2) limiting or restricting access to trade secret subject
matter; and (3) executing Confidential Agreements or Non-disclosure agreements
with employees and business partners.
B. Non-competition
Agreements
A
non-competition agreement can restrict employees who possess trade secrets from
leaving and taking a position with a competitor of the employer or setting up a
competitive business themselves. A
non-competition agreement is generally enforceable as long as it is reasonable
in nature and employees are paid a certain amount of compensation. However, based on different local rules
and practice, two local people’s courts may reach two completely different
decisions on whether a compensation clause is needed or what constitutes a
sufficient amount of compensation. Therefore, when a U.S. employer wishes
to include a non-competition agreement or clause in it employment contract, it
is critical for a legal counsel to check the relevant local rules and
regulations.
IV. Conclusion
For
the purpose of protecting intellectual property rights in China, it is
suggested that U.S. companies do
the following: (1) register their trademarks, patents, and copyrights quickly
and as appropriate with the assistance of legal counsel and local Chinese
intellectual property agencies licensed by the Chinese government; (2) obtain proper employment contracts
to protect inventions and trade secrets; (3) establish and keep good
relationships with major administrative authorities; (4) promptly report
intellectual property right infringements to the administrative authorities and
actively collaborate with those authorities in their investigations; (5) if
necessary, file a law suit before the court and ask for preliminary injunction
against infringement from the court, or file a complaint with an administrative
authority with a request for relief through Chinese prosecutors for criminal
action.