|
|  |
 |
 |
NORTH AMERICA
Regulation of Greenhouse Gases: The Management of Uncertainty
Beirne, Maynard & Parsons LLP , Houston
by James E. Smith & Benjamin A. Escobar
Public awareness and perception of global warming accelerated by carbon emissions is increasingly compelling to lawmakers and regulators around the world. Under the Bush administration, regulatory control within the U.S. lagged behind Europe and much of the world, although it is by far the leading generator of greenhouse gases (GHG).
[FULL STORY]
|
Watching from the Wings with Baited Breath – The WAL-MART Cases Before the Supreme Court of Canada and What They Might Mean for Employers in Canada
Robinson Sheppard Shapiro LLP, Montreal
by Mr. Theodore Goloff
Two sets of cases before the Supreme Court of Court, that were recently pleaded and which derive from Wal-Mart’s closing of its Jonquière store some years ago - Pedneault and Desbiens – have the potential of becoming a legal tsunami in terms of their impact on employers!
These cases have morphed into an allegedly Charter based challenge to what seemed to be an already clearly established employer right to go out of business at any time and for any reason – all of this with the possibility of very serious and unexpected consequences for employers.
[FULL STORY]
|
Bankruptcy Primer for Landlords with Commercial Leases in the United States
Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk and Rabkin, San Francisco
by Gary M. Kaplan
Lease agreements in the United States are subject to special treatment in bankruptcy cases that is often contrary to the terms of the lease itself or relevant non-bankruptcy law. This article discusses several of the most important matters impacting a commercial landlord in the U.S. bankruptcy case of its tenant, including the tenant’s assumption (i.e., ratification), rejection (i.e., anticipatory repudiation) or assignment of a lease; lease obligations pending assumption, rejection or assignment; and the treatment of claims arising from the assumption, rejection or assignment of a lease.
[FULL STORY]
|
Distressed Real Estate: Can Possible Tax Advantages Be As Simple As ABC?
Arnstein & Lehr, LLP, Chicago
by James A. Chatz, William A. Brandt, Jr. & Catherine E. Vance
What the tempting simplicity of the above title refers to is the possible tax advantages that could be engendered for builders and developers through the use of an “ABC,” otherwise known as an Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors. An ABC is one of those arcane vehicles employed by professionals in the world of restructuring, and it’s just another means of arranging for the disposition of a troubled entity’s assets.
[FULL STORY]
|
De-stressing the Due Diligence Process: Issues to Consider When Acquiring Distressed Residential Developments
Epstein Becker & Green, P.C., Atlanta
by M. Maxine Hicks, Linda Ragan Warnke and Jenny A. Lipana
“Distressed properties” is a term that for some represents opportunity - a chance to capitalize on bargain prices. A low price, however, is not always the benchmark of a good deal. Numerous issues beyond just the dirt and the bricks impact whether a distressed property is a good investment opportunity. If you are considering acquiring a distressed property, proper attention to adequate due diligence will help you understand the issues and obligations you stand to inherit and avoid costly hidden surprises.
[FULL STORY]
|
Product Safety in the USA: Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008
Epstein Becker & Green, P.C., Atlanta
by Jeffrey Y. Lewis
On August 14,2008, a new product safety law came into effect. The "Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008," with more than 40 provisions, constitutes the fullest compilation of the American product safety laws, which since 1972 fall under the authority of the "Consumer Product Safety Commission." Even though the majority of requirements relate to the toy
industry, there is one requirement which is of importance to all manufacturers of consumer goods.
[FULL STORY]
|
Major Overhaul of the Air Carrier Access Act Effective May 13, 2009
Beirne, Maynard & Parsons LLP , Houston
by Andrew McGill
On May 13, 2009, the provisions of the reformed Air Carrier Access Act (ACAA) will be effective, and commercial carriers (including foreign carriers) need to prepare to comply with its amendments. The Act has been amended ten times since 1990, and the Department of Transportation has frequently issued guidance and interpretation of the Act. Recognizing the need for the patch-work body of law relating to the ACAA to be collected in one place, the Department of Transportation issued multiple notices of proposed rulemaking in 2007 and 2008, and then issued a notice on May 13, 2008 announcing its final rule that the entire ACAA would be reorganized and updated.
[FULL STORY]
|
Hall Street Associates and the Federal Arbitration Act: Toward the Eventual Arbitration of Legal Questions With Factual Issues
Beirne, Maynard & Parsons LLP , Houston
by George B. Murr & James. E. Smith
In March of 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 decision that the Federal Arbitration Act does not allow a federal court to consider and decide issues of law as part of its confirming an arbitration award. Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. ___ (2008), No. 06-989, slip op. at 1-2 (U.S. March 28, 2008) (Souter, J.). Despite the traditional deference afforded to the contracting parties' arbitration agreement, the Supreme Court held that the specific language of the Federal Arbitration Act simply does not allow a federal court to do anything other than either confirm the arbitration award or vacate, modify or correct it where there has been "egregious departures from the parties' agreed-upon arbitration," such as "corruption," "fraud," "evident partiality," "misconduct," or "misbehavior." Id. at 9. Accordingly, the language of the Federal Arbitration Act does not afford the federal court "review for just any legal error." Id. Concluding, the majority recognized the potential need for having the courts decide the law, but stated that, "whatever the consequences of our holding, the statutory text gives us no business to expand the statutory grounds." Id. at 12.
[FULL STORY]
|
|
|  |
 |
 |
|
ARCHIVE
|
International Legal News
August 15, 2008
Vol. 5
Issue 2
|
Bullet"iln" Volume 7 Issue 1
March 17, 2008
Vol. 7
Issue 1
|
International Legal News
February 8, 2008
Vol. 5
Issue 1
|
The Bullet"iln" Volume 6 Issue 2
September 14, 2007
Vol. 6
Issue 2
|
International Legal News
July 31, 2007
Vol. 4
Issue 2
|
The Bullet"iln" Volume 6 Issue 1
March 18, 2007
Vol. 6
Issue 1
|
International Legal News
January 12, 2007
Vol. 4
Issue 1
|
Bullet"iln" Volume 5 Issue 2
July 13, 2006
Vol. 5
Issue 2
|
The International Legal News
June 20, 2006
Vol. 3
Issue 1
|
International Legal News
December 28, 2005
Vol. 2
Issue 2
|
International Legal News
June 10, 2005
Vol. 2
Issue 1
|
Bullet"iln" Volume 4 Issue 1
May 27, 2005
Vol. 4
Issue 1
|
Bullet"iln" Volume 3 Issue 4
December 29, 2004
Vol. 3
Issue 4
|
International Legal News
December 10, 2004
Vol. 1
Issue 2
|
|
|