Update: As we went to press with this article, the U.K. finalized its RoHS legislation.
The professional audio gear that we all make a living with
is about to fundamentally change forever. On July 1, 2006, the European Union
directive on the
Restriction of Hazardous Substance, or RoHS, will take effect.
This directive bans the use of certain hazardous substances in the manufacture
or sale of electronics within the EU and will affect every aspect of how our
gear is designed, constructed, sold, used and even repaired.
The RoHS directive and its closely related law known as the
WEEE (Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment) directive
are part of a
legislation initiative designed to reduce “e-waste” - the growing toxic heap of
discarded technology clogging our landfills. RoHS specifically bans Lead (Pb),
Cadmium (Cd), Mercury (Hg), Hexavalent Chromium (Cr6+), Polybrominated Biphenyls
(PBB) and Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDE).
The most dramatic challenge will be the ban on lead –
specifically, lead solder. The higher melting points of the lead-free solder
require finding components able to withstand the higher temperature and, in some
cases, retooling the entire manufacturing process.
These regulations are particularly difficult for the small
to medium sized manufacturers that create products for our industry.
PSC,
Lectrosonics, and
Zaxcom all say they'll be directly affected by RoHS.
“Circuit boards and their associated components have been soldered using
tin-lead solder for more than 80 years,” says Ron Meyer,
President of PSC. “Now these same assemblies must be soldered using tin-nickel
and/or tin-nickel-copper based solders. The drawback to these reformulated
compounds is that they have much higher melting points than conventional
tin-lead solder, do not flow out as smoothly and are susceptible to producing
tin ‘whiskers’ that can cause short circuits. In some cases, these new solder
formulations require temperatures that are more than 125 degrees hotter than
traditional solders. This change in soldering temperature causes added stress
to many electronic components, causing failure before the product is even
finished.”
Bruce Jones, Lectrosonics’ VP of marketing concurs, adding,
“The fundamental problem is the availability of parts that can withstand the
higher temperatures of lead free solders…At the higher temps, many of the parts
do not survive the trip through the surface mount ovens.”
Manufacturers are also having difficulty finding components
that are RoHS compliant. “All components used in the assembly of the product
must be lead-free,” says Meyer. “They may not have any tin-lead plated leads,
wires, etc. At this point in time, only a small portion of components are
‘lead-free’ which makes building electronic products rather difficult. Finally,
some specific components contain one or more of the other banned elements and
thus cannot be used in a RoHS certified product. In this case, we have had to
redesign circuits using compliant components.”
Of course, redesigns of existing product takes away
resources from R&D for new products and adds additional costs. As for future
designs, Meyer comments, “When you know what the design parameters are from the
start, then you just design your products with the RoHS initiative in mind.
Many of the newer products are now going to be more expensive to produce for
some time to come, until everything is produced in this way. Lead was a very
cheap element; nickel and copper and gold are much more expensive.” Jones adds
that, “It is costing everyone a lot of time and money…Small companies who
outsource PCB production will have to make the transition with new designs and
inventory until everything is converted. Large companies who have no choice but
to convert or add production capacity for lead free have to spend lots of money
on equipment, engineering and inventories.” Zaxcom’s Glenn Sanders is slightly
more optimistic, speculating that RoHS initiatives might only add a maximum of
5% to the end users’ price.
Perhaps most disturbing is the possibility of decreased
reliability of equipment during the transition. “At the present time, the lead
free solders are more brittle than the tin/lead type, which may have some impact
on reliability and ruggedness in the field,” says Jones. Meyer adds, “Many
people are trying to use existing [surface mount wave soldering] equipment and
this will result in cracked solder joints and intermittent failures.”
Lectrosonics’ immediate reaction to the problems of RoHS
compliance is indeed very radical. “In our case, we simply cannot justify the
conversion at the present time and may be forced to forego sales in Europe until
we can comply….The volume of product sold into Europe is only a small percentage
of our total, so we cannot convert half of our production capacity to a lead
free line to support a small percentage of sales.”
Of course, this can’t be a permanent solution for
Lectrosonics, since China, Canada, and Taiwan have all announced similar
legislation. In fact, the California state legislature has recently announced
that they will enact their own version of RoHS which will go into effect on
January 1, 2007.
There's no doubt that lead is a dangerous substance and that regulation can
be extremely beneficial. Jamie Lincoln Kitman pointed out in
"The
Secret History of Lead" for
The Nation that since
the 1986 outlawing of lead as an automobile gasoline additive, the American
public's mean blood-lead level is down more than 75 percent. However, the net benefits
of RoHS in particular are questionable, especially in light of early exemptions
gained by lobbies working on behalf of the transportation and computer
industries. As
Laura Turbini and Dennis Bernier write in
The Handbook of Lead-Free Solder
Technology for Microelectronic Assemblies:
New lead-free
solders will not reduce the amount of the amount of lead ore that is mined, but
will require an increased use of less available metals. The manufacturing
process involved for electronic assembly will result in an increased energy
usage and generation of increased scrap, both having a negative impact on the
environment. Exploiting scarce resources to obtain solder alloys that may not be
as reliable or environmentally-friendly as conventional tin-lead solder is a
questionable solution.
“Will the world be a better place once we have made the
transition?” reflects Lectrosonics’ Jones. “Perhaps. But, as usual with
bureaucracies, the original intent often goes by the wayside as politics and
money become the primary focus. In my opinion, the economic impact in Europe is
going to far outweigh the social and health benefits, and they may just push the
deadline farther into the future. We'll just have to wait and see.”
Thanks to Bruce Jones, Ron Meyer and Glenn Sanders for
their participation in this article.
[PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION]