League of California Cities: Focus on Housing

Monday, September 18, 2006 Volume II - Issue 7  
UNSUBSCRIBE
HOME
CONTENTS
Editor's Note
Prop. 90: A Serious Threat to New Housing
Housing Providers/Advocates Opposing Proposition 90
Recent Poll Shows Strengthened Voter Support for Infrastructure Bonds
Housing Bond Would Fund City Parks and Infill Housing Infrastructure Projects
Statewide Housing Crisis Requires Local Solutions
Housing Trusts - Another Tool in the Affordable Housing Toolbox
HCD Director Visits with City Lobbyists
Housing in the News
San Leandro Meets Community Need with Affordable Senior Housing
Recent Poll Shows Strengthened Voter Support for Infrastructure Bonds

A mid-August poll by the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) found that 57 percent of 989 likely voters would vote in support of the housing infrastructure bond on the November ballot if the election were held today.

The August 16-23 survey focused on four of five infrastructure bonds on the November ballot, and showed the following levels of support:

  • Prop. 1B (transportation): 50 percent sup- port vs. 38 percent oppose, 12 percent undecided
  • Prop. 1C (housing): 57 percent support vs. 32 percent oppose, 11 percent unde- cided
  • Prop. 1D (education): 51 percent support vs. 39 percent oppose, 10 percent undecided
  • Prop. 1E (water facilities & levee repair): 56 percent support vs. 35 percent oppose, 9 percent undecided

The poll had a margin of error of plus or minus three percentage points. The survey did not ask voters about their support for Proposition 84, the Clean Water, Parks and Coastal Protection Initiative.

The 57-32 percent support for the housing infrastructure bond, Proposition 1C, was encouraging news for the League and other organizations concerned about the need for additional funding to pay for housing-related infrastructure. A July Field poll had shown only 33 percent in support, vs. 42 percent opposed and 25 percent undecided.

The PPIC poll showed stronger support for the bond measures among Democrats than GOP voters; 50 percent or more of the latter do not support any of the bonds, compared to more than 60 percent support by Democrats. However, 59 percent of all questioned view the total bond package of $42 billion as too much debt for the state to take on.

PPIC Director of Research Mark Baldassare discussed portions of the survey findings at the League of California Cities’ annual conference in San Diego. At a September 7 session entitled "Financing Infrastructure Improvements in Cities," he reported that California city officials and voters are at opposite ends of the spectrum regarding how bond money should be spent.

Seventy-five percent of California city officials polled in the PPIC survey indicated that transportation – highways, roads, bridges, ports and airports – should be the top infrastructure priority for local and state works projects. By contrast, 50 percent of California voters polled in the survey chose schools and universities to top the list.

The League of California supports Propositions 1A through 1E, and Proposition 84 on the November ballot.

To view the full survey, click here.


[PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION]
Published by League of California Cities: Focus on Housing
Copyright © 2006 League of California Cities. All rights reserved.
E-MAIL TO A COLLEAGUE
Powered by IMN