As
the season approaches, and talk turns to shaving legs, Body Glide and Pam, you
may also hear your friends talk about things like VO
2 max, VO
2
max pace, lactate threshold, or anaerobic threshold. If you find your head spinning from all this scientific terminology
or just want to know how these principles can help you get faster, then be sure
to read this month’s Science of Speed column for a review of common athletic
physiology terms.
VO2 max: This stands for the maximal
level of “oxygen (O
2) volume” that your body can utilize during
strenuous exercise. It is also called “aerobic capacity”. We like to think of it as the size of your
engine
. It is measured in the
lab by increasing the exercise workload every one minute (incremental ramp
test) to three minutes (incremental steady state test) on a treadmill, cycle
ergometer, rowing erg, swimming flume (e.g. ”endless pool”), x-country ski
machine, etc. During weight bearing
exercise such as running, it is usually reported in relative units –
milliliters of O
2 per kilogram of body weight per minute of
exercise, or mL/kg/min. For
non-weight-bearing activity, such as cycling, it is often reported in absolute
units – liters per minute, or L/min.
VO
2
max is the oldest variable for measuring overall cardiovascular fitness
levels. A sedentary adult who starts
jogging 3 times a week can improve his or her VO
2 max by 20 to 25
percent in 10-15 weeks, or from 37 to 45 mL/kg/min, for example. Many recreational triathletes will have VO
2
max’s in the 50’s, pretty good one’s in the low to mid 60’s, and elite racers
in the high 60’s or 70’s. Milers and 5K
runners tend to have higher a VO
2 max than marathoners. Coaching legend Dr. Jack Daniels reported
that he tested Steve Prefontaine prior to the 1972 Olympics, while maybe in the
best shape of his life, at 90 mL/kg/min.
Gulp.
So
will a person with a higher VO
2 max always go faster than a person
with a lower VO
2 max?
No. The reason is that there are
other variables important to race performance which can compensate for having a
lower VO
2 max. For example,
the great miler Peter Snell was once measured at 72 mL/kg/min but he and
Prefontaine both ran 3:54 miles. VO
2
max is simply a measure of the general endurance potential under the hood. Although someone with a VO
2 max
of 50 will not be winning Ironman Hawaii next year, he or she is still capable
of racing faster than people with a moderately higher VO
2 max.
It
is important to note that once you are well trained, your VO
2 max
will not increase by much, if at all. However, VO
2 max does decrease
with age, roughly 4-5 mL/kg/min every decade, or 25-40% from 20 to 65 years old
in most people. If there is not much a
well-trained athlete can do to improve his or her VO
2 max, this
leads to the question, “Which variables may prove more useful in improving
training and performance?
Running velocity or power
output at VO2 max: Aha! Now we
have a winner. Consistent with the
results of the cycling study that we wrote about last month in which peak power
output predicted performance in a 90-min time trial, numerous running studies
have demonstrated that peak running pace at the end of an incremental test is
highly correlated with performance in events from 8K and up. Yes, not only in those short 10 K
“sprints”. Renowned exercise
physiologist Dr. Tim Noakes found that ultramarathoners’ VO
2 max
paces even predicted performance in
90K
races. Finally, some research that does
not have to be extrapolated to apply to Ironman performance!
Anaerobic or lactate threshold: This is an increasingly
popular variable that can be measured quite easily in a lab setting. It is most
useful for determining training heart rates for different types of
workouts. It is less useful as a
predictor of performance, though it does correlate more closely than VO
2
max . Unfortunately, the lack of
uniform criteria has caused some confusion among coaches and athletes. “Anaerobic” threshold, or “onset of blood
lactate accumulation” (OBLA) usually refers to the exercise workload or heart
rate at which a blood lactate level of 4 mmol/L is elicited. “Maximal lactate steady state” refers to the
highest lactate level that can be maintained for the final 20 min of a 30 min
exercise bout at a constant workload.
This definition takes into account that it can take at least 10-20 minutes
for the blood lactate level to fully stabilize at a given workload. Since that would take repeat testing on
different days to pinpoint the threshold, the impracticality prohibits the pure
use of that definition in the real world.
In the research arena, it has been noticed that the muscle groups used
for different sports affect this variable.
Well-trained groups of speed skaters could hold a blood lactate level of
6.5 mmol/L, cyclists 5.0 mmol/L, and rowers 3.0 mmol/L.
Another
common criteria for determining the lactate threshold is the point on the
lactate curve at which linearity ends and steeper increases of >1 mmol/L occur with each increase in
workload. For training purposes, this
must be interpreted with discernment because the inflection point can occur as
low as ~2 mmol.
To
test recreational athletes who are employed and have to train on the side, a
happy medium is to use 3-4 min incremental stages in one test to obtain a
reasonable estimate of the blood lactate level at a given exercise
intensity. It is important to test when
you are not fatigued or glycogen depleted.
Next month we will discuss the application of the lactate threshold to heart
rate based training.
Fractional utilization of VO2
max: This is simply the percentage of your VO
2
max or your maximal heart rate (HR max) that can be sustained over a given race
distance. The legendary Dr. Per-Olaf
Astrand roughly estimated that a well-trained endurance athlete can maintain
100% of VO
2 max (98-100% HR max) pace for approximately 10 min, 95%
(96% HR max) for 30 min, 85% (90% HR max) for 1 hr, and 80% (85% HR max) for 2
hr. Athletes with a lower VO
2
max must race at a higher
fraction of
their VO
2 max to beat someone with a higher VO
2 max. Thus, it is advantageous to have a higher
lactate threshold. For example, highly
trained athletes can have a threshold at 85-90% of VO
2 max (90-92%
HR max) and moderately trained recreational athletes are often 75-84% VO
2
max (80-89% HR max).
Economy of Movement: Obviously, the more efficient the running style or the better the
swim strokes, the faster the performance.
This means that at a given pace, you have a lower VO
2 (use less oxygen
) than a less efficient athlete.
Biomechanist Dr. Peter Cavanaugh found that the VO
2 of elite
runners was 6% lower than that of sub-elite runners at a 6:00 mile pace. Athletes with higher training volumes
usually are more efficient than those with significantly lower training volumes
(although this is not an excuse to overtrain).
Dr. Scrimgeour showed that runners training >60 miles/wk had lower VO
2s at various paces than
runners training less. Of interest,
physiologist Dr. David Costill found that at different paces, the VO
2
of marathoners was 5-10% lower than that of middle distance runners.
Summary: These are a few of the variables that make you what you are in
the pool or out on the road. Though all
are significant in distinguishing between different groups of athletes, within
similar groupings, sweat, grit, and smart training can make up for an awful lot
(i.e. your genetic lot in life). As we
mentioned last month, your pace or power output at VO
2 max is not
only a good predictor of performance, but a good variable for tracking
improvement. With this
vocabulary set, we will start applying these principles to heart rate based
training next month. Sorry, too late to
help for St. Croix, Lanzarote or Brazil, but just in time for Utah and
Blackwater!
Dr. Dan Moser, Ph D, is the director of research and clinical services
at ELITE Health & Wellness (http://www.elitewellness.com). Coming from a background in track and field,
he has more than 10 years of experience
testing professional and recreational athletes, including triathletes, runners,
cyclists, in-line skaters, and hockey players.
Jeff Devlin is an endurance coach and former professional triathlete,
who offers practical insights into the application of the latest science. Jeff
holds five national championship titles and two 3rd place finishes at the
Hawaii Ironman. He runs his own international coaching business, Human
Performance Engineering (http://www.jeffdevlin.com).