The Oilspot
Wednesday, March 27, 2002 VOLUME 7 ISSUE 13  


FRONT PAGE



CRS Believes that Brownfields Legislation is Confusing for Prospective Purchasers
UST Clean-Up Pilot to Become Permanent
House Subcommittee Holds Hearing on EPA Elevation


Bush Proposes Small Business Tax Cuts


Venezuela Seeks More from Citgo
Shell to Acquire Pennzoil-Quaker State


Gas Prices Jump a Record 14 Cents


New Packing Requirements Coming
CRS Believes that Brownfields Legislation is Confusing for Prospective Purchasers

The Congressional Research Service (CRS), which provides investigative and research support for congressional offices, has published a report that concludes the recently enacted “Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act” (Public Law No. 107-118) (SBA Act) is confusing to prospective purchasers of contaminated land. In addition to providing funding for the clean-up of contaminated urban industrial sites (or “brownfields”), the new statute gives an exemption from Superfund liability for certain small businesses, innocent landowners, and “bona fide” prospective purchasers.

The CRS report notes that “since the prospect of Superfund liability has long been thought to chill investment in real property that is known or feared to be contaminated,” Congress and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have sought to address the problem. The SBA provides a statutory definition of “bona fide prospective purchaser” and then grants an outright exemption from liability, provided that the buyer:
· demonstrates that all hazardous substance disposal at the facility occurred pre-acquisition
· makes “all appropriate inquiries” into contamination at the site
· exercises “appropriate care” as to hazardous substances found at the facility by taking “reasonable steps” to stop releases and prevent any future threatened releases
· provides full cooperation and access to persons authorized to conduct response actions or natural resource restorations
· complies with pertinent land use restrictions and does not impede institutional controls
· is not potentially liable, or affiliated with anyone who is
The CRS report notes that “issues remain” because the Act leaves the definition of “reasonable steps” open to interpretation. CRS believes “if a landowner guesses incorrectly, his/her liability exemption disappears,” prompting some in the regulated community to advocate the use of both the new “bona fide” standard and the old “prospective purchaser agreement” (PPA) when entering into a brownfields acquisition. According to the CRS report, EPA plans to publish guidance in the future that will address these questions.


[PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION]

WHAT'S YOUR OPINION?

What's your opinion on the subject? To post a letter in response to this story, click Post Letter.

[POST LETTER]
Published by FuelQuest, Inc., in partnership with ILMA
Copyright © 2002 FuelQuest Inc., and the Independent Lubricant Manufacturers Association. All rights reserved.
All Rights Reserved and all of the releases provided are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties, conventions. All reproductions, other than for an individual user's reference, is prohibited without prior written consent. Oilspot.com is a registered trademark of FuelQuest, Inc. FlashPoint is a registered trademark of ILMA, Contact FuelQuest at: (713) 222-5700 Contact ILMA at: (703) 684-5574
Forward to a Friend