The Oilspot
Wednesday, March 27, 2002 VOLUME 7 ISSUE 13  


FRONT PAGE



CRS Believes that Brownfields Legislation is Confusing for Prospective Purchasers
UST Clean-Up Pilot to Become Permanent
House Subcommittee Holds Hearing on EPA Elevation


Bush Proposes Small Business Tax Cuts


Venezuela Seeks More from Citgo
Shell to Acquire Pennzoil-Quaker State


Gas Prices Jump a Record 14 Cents


New Packing Requirements Coming
New Packing Requirements Coming
Chemicals, low-viscosity hydrocarbons included

Effective October 25, 2002 the Consumer Product Safety Commission will require child-resistant packaging for certain products that contain low-viscosity hydrocarbons. The requirement applies to certain prepackaged nonemulsion-type liquid household chemical products, including drugs and cosmetics, that contain ten (10) percent or more hydrocarbons by weight and have a viscosity of less than one hundred (100) Saybolt Universal Seconds (SUS) at 100 degrees F (covered products). As stated in the final rule notice 16 CFR 1700, hydrocarbons are defined as compounds that consist solely of carbon and hydrogen.

For a product that contains multiple hydrocarbons, the total percentage of hydrocarbons in the product is the sum of the percentages by weight of the individual hydrocarbon components.

The Pollution Prevention Packaging Act (PPPA) in effect as of this date also requires child-resistant packaging for certain household products containing petroleum distillates. These PPPA-regulated products include prepackaged liquid kindling and illuminating preparations, prepackaged solvents for paint or other similar surface-coating materials (e.g., paint thinners), and nonemulsion liquid furniture polish. Several packaging types that would be exempted from the rules include: products packaged in aerosol cans, mechanical pumps or trigger sprayers, provided the aerosol, mechanical pump or trigger sprayer, expelled the product as a mist. For mechanical pumps and trigger sprayers, the spray mechanism would be required to be permanently attached to the bottle or have a CR attachment. However, if the mechanical pump or trigger sprayer expelled product as a stream, the entire package including the pump mechanism would have been required to be CR. Aerosol products that formed a stream by the addition of an extension tube inserted into the nozzle would have been excluded from the packaging requirements if without the extension tube, the product would be expelled as a mist.

To learn more if CPSC childproof cap regulations apply to you, go to the following website at http://www.cpsc.gov/BUSINFO/frnotices/fr02/hydrocarbon.html or call the Office of Compliance at (301) 504-0608.


[PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION]

WHAT'S YOUR OPINION?

What's your opinion on the subject? To post a letter in response to this story, click Post Letter.

[POST LETTER]
Published by FuelQuest, Inc., in partnership with ILMA
Copyright © 2002 FuelQuest Inc., and the Independent Lubricant Manufacturers Association. All rights reserved.
All Rights Reserved and all of the releases provided are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties, conventions. All reproductions, other than for an individual user's reference, is prohibited without prior written consent. Oilspot.com is a registered trademark of FuelQuest, Inc. FlashPoint is a registered trademark of ILMA, Contact FuelQuest at: (713) 222-5700 Contact ILMA at: (703) 684-5574
Forward to a Friend