The Oilspot
Wednesday, January 23, 2002 VOLUME 7 ISSUE 5  


FRONT PAGE



Kerry Attacks Bush Plan
EPA's Electronic Reporting Deadline Extended Again


New NSF Nonfood Registration Information Available
Daschle Says HMO Reform Conference Will Go Forward
OSHA Issues Recordkeeping Compliance Directive


Valero Details Cuts
Annual Petroleum Demand Falls


Unocal Sues Valero Over Patents
Fuel Cells? Not Yet


DOJ Report on Chemical Security Delayed Again


DTN Energy Acquires GE's PetroDEX
DOJ Report on Chemical Security Delayed Again
Was due Dec. 21, 2001

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has failed to produce a congressionally mandated report on the methods used for assessing vulnerability of chemical plants to terrorist activity. The report, which was to have been completed by December 21, 2001, was required under the “Chemical Safety Information, Site Security and Fuels Regulatory Relief Act of 1999” (CSISSFRRA). DOJ also failed to complete an earlier, interim report, which was to have been published in August 2000.

CSISSFRRA directs industrial facilities to file risk management plans (RMPs) with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in June of each year. Included in the RMP reports is an estimate of how many people living near a facility may be affected by a massive chemical spill, including projections of property damage, injury, and death. These reports are referred to as “off-site consequence analyses” (OCA). Over 15,000 chemical facilities are required to file RMPs.

EPA and DOJ did not meet a deadline to publish regulations implementing CSISSFRRA, the delay in releasing these two reports has raised eyebrows on Capitol Hill, particularly in the aftermath of the September 11th terrorist attacks. However, the federal government is taking steps to restrict public access to the sensitive information contained in the OCAs.

DOJ asked the Department of Energy’s Sandia laboratories to provide a template that chemical companies could use to determine potential security vulnerabilities within a facility. Sources say that the Bush Administration has delayed publication of the DOJ methods analysis because security industry interests have complained that the methodologies laid out by Sandia are too cumbersome, and would delay any meaningful vulnerability review.

The American Chemistry Council (ACC) is reviewing the Sandia draft and is looking into developing an alternative methodology. ACC already has provided part of the funding for the DOJ report.

EPA has suggested that all chemical facilities review the physical security of their plants during this period of heightened awareness against terrorist threats. EPA’s Office of Chemical Emergency Preparedness and Prevention (CEPPO) urges all chemical facilities and transporters to review the Agency’s “Chemical Safety Alert” published in February 2000. The document is available on the internet at http://www.epa.gov/ceppo/pubs/secale.pdf .
ACC also has made site security information available on its website at http://www.americanchemistry.com/cmawebsite.nsf/s?readform&nnar-53rkt8 .


[PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION]

WHAT'S YOUR OPINION?

What's your opinion on the subject? To post a letter in response to this story, click Post Letter.

[POST LETTER]
Published by FuelQuest, Inc., in partnership with ILMA
Copyright © 2002 FuelQuest Inc., and the Independent Lubricant Manufacturers Association. All rights reserved.
All Rights Reserved and all of the releases provided are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties, conventions. All reproductions, other than for an individual user's reference, is prohibited without prior written consent. Oilspot.com is a registered trademark of FuelQuest, Inc. FlashPoint is a registered trademark of ILMA, Contact FuelQuest at: (713) 222-5700 Contact ILMA at: (703) 684-5574
Forward to a Friend