The Oilspot
Wednesday, December 12, 2001 VOLUME 6 ISSUE 49  



FRONT PAGE



OSHA, EPA Regulatory Agendas Highlight Agency Priorities
Bill Introduced to Reauthorize Federal HazMat Law
President Signs Internet Tax Moratorium Legislation
"Four Pollutant" Bill to be Marked Up in February
Light Trucks to Boost Mileage in 2005


RSPA Extends Comment Deadline for Loading/Unloading Rule
ILMA Meets with ACGIH Committee
ILMA Attends ORC Recordkeeping Workshop
OSHA Issues Metalworking Guide


Crude Climbs as U.S. Stocks Fall
Phillips to Raise Capital Spending
OPEC Struggles With Compliance


LA Dealers Claim Price Fixing
Gasoline Retails at 2-Year Low
Pentagon Faces $2 Billion Suit
Average Weekly Retail Gasoline Prices


Whitman Appoints Dunne to EPA Solid Waste Post
Husky Energy’s Blair to Resign
Cook Named MAP Senior Vice President


Q&A with Rep. Bill Lipinski (D-IL)
"Four Pollutant" Bill to be Marked Up in February
Sen. Jim Jeffords (I-VT)

Sen. Jim Jeffords (I-VT), Chairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works (EPW), has announced that he will hold a long-awaited mark-up on his so-called “four pollutant” bill in February. The legislation (S. 556) calls for significant reductions in the emissions of nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxides, carbon dioxide (CO2), and mercury from power plants and other industrial facilities by 2007.

The Bush Administration opposes the Jeffords plan to control CO2, and has pledged to introduce its own multi-pollutant bill. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has not yet released the details of its plan, as the Agency has been deeply involved in responding to terrorist threats, clean-up at the World Trade Center, and sanitation of anthrax-contaminated sites in Washington, D.C., and other areas. EPA now believes that the plan will be unveiled in late January.

Republicans on the EPW Committee, with the exception of Senator Lincoln Chafee (R?RI), oppose the Jeffords bill. Industry also is opposed to the Jeffords bill, because it likely would force a full-scale move away from coal-powered electricity generation. Industry representatives do, however, support reductions in certain pollutants (but not CO2) if facilities are given flexibility in reaching the goals; if the costs are not excessively burdensome; if emissions trading is permitted; if the controversial New Source Review program is reformed; and if adequate time is provided to meet the goals of the legislation.


[PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION]

WHAT'S YOUR OPINION?

What's your opinion on the subject? To post a letter in response to this story, click Post Letter.

[POST LETTER]
Published by FuelQuest, Inc., in partnership with ILMA
Copyright © 2001 FuelQuest Inc., and the Independent Lubricant Manufacturers Association. All rights reserved.
All Rights Reserved and all of the releases provided are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties, conventions. All reproductions, other than for an individual user's reference, is prohibited without prior written consent. Oilspot.com is a registered trademark of FuelQuest, Inc. FlashPoint is a registered trademark of ILMA, Contact FuelQuest at: (713) 222-5700 Contact ILMA at: (703) 684-5574
Forward to a Friend