Policy Perspectives
www.cppa.utah.edu

Wednesday, October 28, 2009 Revenue and Budget, City Fiscal Conditions, Serve America Act   Volume 5 Issue 10  
HOME
CONTENTS
The New Economy: Preparing Utah for the Future
Revenue Estimating and Budgeting in Utah: A Primer
Fiscal Condition of Utah’s Cities
What Will the Kennedy Serve America Act Mean to Utah?
Annoying Behaviors - or Name the Elephants in the Room
Wanted: Good Ideas
Graduate Fair for Working Professionals
About Policy Perspectives...
ARCHIVE
Jail, Social Media & GRAMA, Nonprofits & the Economy
September 30, 2009
Township Laws, CPPA Future, Upcoming Events
August 26, 2009
Discrimination, Stroke Care, Data  
July 29, 2009
Redistricting, Voter Turnout
June 24, 2009
Health Insurance, Graduation
May 27, 2009

[MORE]
SEARCH
Search for articles and archives containing:
SUBSCRIBE

Enter your email address in the box below to receive an email each time we post a new issue:


Add Remove
Send as HTML
 

Annoying Behaviors - or Name the Elephants in the Room
by Ken Embley, CPPA

Why it is okay to park a car in a no parking zone ten feet away from the entrance to a grocery store?  Why it is okay for a newspaper to find its way onto a bus or into a restroom but seldom comes back out?  Why it is okay for a driver to weave through traffic?  Why it is okay for someone who works out at a gym to take an exercise ball, mat or other equipment and fail to return that equipment to the common area?  For me, these are all examples of annoying behaviors.

Annoying behaviors can find their way into the workplace and if unchecked, they can wreak havoc.  The challenge is to have a healthy enough organization where these behaviors and other tough issues can be exposed and rendered harmless without embarrassment or anger.

In a well functioning organization, no issue is too sensitive to be raised at a meeting, and no questions are off-limits—to include the annoying behaviors of peers and associates.  If someone believes it important to address an issue or challenge someone’s annoying behavior, it is not only all right to make that challenge, it is expected.

Given the following questions, rate your workgroup on a one to five scale.  For the first two questions, one means “slow” and five means “fast.”  For the third question, one means “no” and five means “yes”.

 Descriptions

Rating

1.  How long does it take for conversations to get from inside people’s heads to the coffee machine and then to meeting rooms?

1    2    3    4    5

2.  How quickly are crises identified and bad news discussed?

1    2    3    4    5

3.  Are there structures, incentives, and support for speaking the unspeakable?

1    2    3    4    5

Of course, the ideal is a quick response time and structures in place (the perfect score is 15).  Does your group have room for improvement?

If you want to improve, the next time someone asks a hard question or raises difficult issues, ensure that people in authority provide some protective cover for that courageous individual to help keep the issue alive, even if the issue makes them or others in the room squirm with discomfort.  In this way, crises are identified early on, long before they reach unmanageable proportions.  In turn, people can establish rituals and procedures designed to ensure that the “elephants in the room” get acknowledged and discussed.  The idea is to get hidden perspectives put on the table fairly quickly to enable people to solve tough issues, even those occasional annoying behaviors.

In my opinion, the faster your group can name the elephants in the room, the faster your group will learn to address and resolve tough issues—to include annoying behaviors—and the better your group problem solving and decision making skills.

Acknowledgement:  Some of the concepts found in this article come from The Practice of Adaptive Leadership (Tools and Tactics for Changing Your Organization and the World) by Ronald Heifetz, Alexander Grashow and Marty Linsky, Harvard Business Press, Boston, Massachusetts, Copyright 2009 Cambridge Leadership Associates.  The ISBN is 978-1-4221-0576-4.  Specific references found on pages 102 and 108.


[PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION]
LETTERS

There are no letters for this article. To post your own letter, click Post Letter.

[POST LETTER]
Published by Center for Public Policy & Administration
Copyright © 2009 The University of Utah. All rights reserved.
The Center for Public Policy & Administration offers research, education and services to public and nonprofit organizations that will strengthen administration, leadership and public policy making.
Pass this on to a friend
RSS Feed
Disclaimer
Privacy Policy
Powered by IMN