CMA News

Thursday, October 16, 2003 October, 2003   VOLUME 1 ISSUE 5  
HOME
TOPICS
Chairman Message
In Pictures
anscers Updates
150
News
Events
Articles
CONTENTS
Memories from the Western Region Credit Conference
Online Credit Application Center
California Bills of Interest
California Enacts "Anti Spam" Legislation
Collecting Disputed Balances
Free Webinar Series on Web Services for Business Credit
WRCC Event Pictures
Bust-Out Fraud Tactics
Prepare for Collection Calls
CMA Collection Division Making Changes
ExperienceD the Magic? WRCC Wrap Up
Welcome New Members
California Enacts "Anti Spam" Legislation
by Richard Kaufman, CAE

A new California law will go into effect on January 1, 2004, prohibiting "unsolicited commercial e-mail advertisement," defined as "promoting the lease, sale, rental, gift offer, or other disposition of any property, goods, services, or extension of credit."

The new law is an “opt-in” measure, meaning that an “advertiser” must obtain permission from every recipient in advance of sending an “unsolicited commercial e-mail advertisement” – unless the advertiser enjoys a “preexisting or current business relationship” with the recipient. The term “preexisting or current business relationship” is defined as where "the recipient has made an inquiry and has provided his or her e-mail address, or has made an application, purchase, or transaction, with or without consideration, regarding products or services offered by the advertiser." Even under the “preexisting relationship” exclusion, the "advertiser" (i.e., sender) has to provide an opt-out "toll-free telephone number or...an 'unsubscribe' e-mail" address.

The law pertains to any “person or entity” located in California, or located outside California as to any message sent to an email address in California. It appears that the burden of determining whether a recipient’s email address is in California falls on the sender. Therefore, this “California” law seems to affect all senders of “commercial e-mail advertisements” no matter where the sender is located.

Briefly, the penalties for violating the new law are “$1,000 per transmitted message up to $1,000,000 per incident, as defined, subject to reduction by a court for specified reasons.”

Rumor has it that the direct marketing association and others will challenge the new law in court. However, unless and until a court overturns it in whole or in part, as of the first of next year (2004) this will be the law of the State -- and in effect the law of the (entire) land as suggested above.


[PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION]
Published by CMA Business Credit Services
Copyright © 2003 CMA Business Credit Services. All rights reserved.


To sponsor a future issue of CMA News contact Dina Amadril at 562-432-4807.
TELL A FRIEND
Powered by IMN